Families of 9/11 Victims Condemn Executive Pay Raises at National Memorial Amid Financial Struggles

Families of those lost in the September 11 attacks are voicing strong criticism against the National September 11 Memorial & Museum after newly released financial disclosures revealed substantial pay increases for its top executives. The outcry comes as the institution posts mounting losses despite taxpayer support and steady visitor traffic, raising urgent questions about financial management and priorities at one of America’s most solemn landmarks.

Financial Losses Despite Steady Attendance

The 9/11 Memorial & Museum, which honors nearly 3,000 victims of the 2001 attacks, reported a $19.5 million deficit in 2024, following a similar pattern of red ink in recent years. According to its latest financial filing, the museum generated $93 million in revenue last year, including $4.5 million from taxpayer subsidies. Yet expenses soared to nearly $112 million, widening the funding gap and compounding long-held concerns over the institution’s ability to remain sustainable.

Visitor numbers continue to remain robust, with thousands attending every day, many paying the $36 admission fee plus additional costs for guided tours. Ticket sales, merchandise, and membership programs represent a significant portion of revenue, but they have not been sufficient to offset escalating expenses.

Rising Executive Salaries Draw Scrutiny

The sharpest criticism centers on compensation increases among the nonprofit’s leadership team. The museum’s president and CEO earned $856,216 in 2024, marking a 63% raise since assuming the role in 2022. Several other top executives also received double-digit percentage increases, swelling the organization’s payroll to $34 million last year.

For families of victims, this news has been met with outrage. Many have condemned what they see as misplaced priorities, arguing that funds should go toward upkeep of the memorial site, public programming, educational initiatives, and direct support services for survivors and victims’ relatives. One family spokesperson described the salary increases as “a slap in the face to every person who lost loved ones on that day.”

Historical Context of the Memorial and Museum

The National September 11 Memorial & Museum, located at the World Trade Center site in Lower Manhattan, opened in two phases. The memorial plaza, featuring the twin reflecting pools, was unveiled in 2011 to mark the 10-year anniversary of the attacks. The museum, built partly underground, opened in 2014 after years of construction and fundraising that demanded immense logistical coordination and government support.

From the beginning, the project was met with both reverence and controversy. While many praised its poignant design and powerful exhibits, others criticized the high costs—construction expenses alone surpassed $700 million. Fee structures, funding appeals, and management approaches have frequently been debated, particularly given the site’s role as both a living memorial and a public institution.

Rising Costs and Dependence on Public Funding

The museum operates as a nonprofit but relies in part on city, state, and federal subsidies. Its ability to cover operating expenses has fluctuated widely, often falling short despite strong attendance figures. Maintenance of the sprawling site, security staffing, and programming costs add to its significant operating burden.

The COVID-19 pandemic intensified the problem, with international tourism—one of the biggest drivers of attendance—plummeting in 2020 and 2021. While attendance has recovered in recent years, the lingering financial strain has amplified debates on whether the institution should depend more heavily on donations, endowments, or government backing.

Comparisons With Other Major U.S. Memorials

The financial pressures facing the 9/11 Memorial & Museum stand in contrast to other national remembrance sites. The Pearl Harbor National Memorial in Hawaii, for instance, is operated by the National Park Service and does not charge admission. Similarly, the Oklahoma City National Memorial Museum does charge a fee, but families of victims are given priority access without cost, and executive compensation levels remain substantially lower.

Critics argue that the New York museum’s comparatively high ticket price undermines accessibility for families and tourists alike, creating barriers for those who wish to engage in remembrance. For many, the revelation that leaders are receiving escalating salaries while families struggle to cover travel expenses to the site has become emblematic of a disconnect between the museum’s mission and its management decisions.

Public Reaction and Family Frustration

The backlash from victims’ families has been swift and vocal. Community groups representing survivors and relatives have demanded greater transparency in how funds are allocated and called for an independent review of the museum’s budget practices. Some have urged state and city lawmakers to condition future taxpayer support on stricter financial accountability measures.

Visitors have also voiced mixed feelings. While many describe the site as a moving and necessary place of reflection, some tourists have expressed shock at the cost of entry compared to other national memorials. Online forums and social media platforms have amplified these sentiments, with debates centering on whether a nonprofit dedicated to solemn remembrance should operate under a profit-based structure.

Economic Impact on New York City

Despite its financial struggles, the 9/11 Memorial & Museum remains a major economic driver for Lower Manhattan. The site attracts millions of visitors annually, many of whom also spend money in nearby hotels, restaurants, and businesses. Local tourism groups view the museum as an essential component of New York’s broader travel economy, particularly for international arrivals who consider it a must-see destination.

However, prolonged deficits and public backlash have raised concerns about the institution’s long-term stability. If financial troubles deepen, there could be ripple effects not only for the memorial itself but also for the surrounding community that depends partly on related tourism revenue.

Calls for Reform and Future Outlook

In response to mounting pressure, some board members and advisors have signaled that a reevaluation of executive pay and fiscal management may be forthcoming. Nonprofit watchdog organizations emphasize that leaders of cultural institutions must balance the need to attract skilled executives with the duty to remain financially responsible, particularly when taxpayer funding and public trust are involved.

Families of victims continue to advocate for reforms that would redirect more resources toward site maintenance, educational outreach, and programs to support survivors. Some have urged the museum to explore partnerships with federal or state agencies to reduce dependence on ticket sales and diversify income streams.

A Tense Crossroads for a Sacred Institution

The National September 11 Memorial & Museum finds itself at a pivotal moment. While it remains a reverent and deeply meaningful site visited by millions who wish to honor the victims of one of America’s darkest days, it is now mired in a debate over leadership, finances, and transparency.

For families and the broader public, the issue is not only about salaries or deficits—it is about the integrity of the institution’s mission. As scrutiny intensifies, the museum must navigate the difficult balance between operating as a financially sustainable cultural center and upholding the solemn responsibility of remembrance that it was built to fulfill.

---

Word Count: ~1,260